Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
Friday, June 27, 2008
Chuck Colson :: Townhall.com Columnist
The Legacy of Radical Feminism
by Chuck Colson
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Why did Republicans lose in the 2008 elections?



Alice Walker, best known as the author of the novel The Color Purple, is one of the most renowned feminist authors and activists of her generation. She is also a mother, and that fact brought her public and private lives into direct conflict.

That is because Alice Walker’s brand of feminism was the kind that taught that “motherhood was about the worst thing that could happen to a woman.” So says her daughter, Rebecca, who suffered the consequences of that thinking. In a recent London Daily Mail article, Rebecca Walker reflected on the neglect she experienced with her divorced father across the country and her mother too busy for her, frequently leaving her alone for long periods as a teenager. With her mother’s knowledge—and even support—Rebecca became sexually active at 13 and had an abortion at 14. She was well aware that her mother thought of her as a burden.

The younger Walker—who lives in England—writes now, “My mother’s feminist principles coloured every aspect of my life. As a little girl, I wasn’t even allowed to play with dolls or stuffed toys in case they brought out a maternal instinct. It was drummed into me that being a mother, raising children and running a home were a form of slavery. Having a career, travelling the world and being independent were what really mattered according to her.”

After years of private and public feuding, their estrangement is so deep that Alice has never yet even seen Rebecca’s own son, her grandson. In an early interview, Rebecca suggested that this was the natural result of putting “ideology” before relationships.

As an African-American woman born in 1944, Alice Walker saw her share of injustices. Her instinct to try to put things right was not the problem here. The problem was that she was part of a generation of feminists who believed that the way to correct injustice was to put yourself first and everyone else, including your family, last. Women taught their daughters this by both precept and by example. And as a result, Rebecca says now, “Feminism has betrayed an entire generation of women into childlessness. It is devastating.”

Rebecca has met many women who avoided having children because they thought that it was their duty to do so, and now are despondent that it is no longer possible for them to do so.

Rebecca Walker is no one’s idea of a cultural conservative—she and her child’s father are unmarried by choice, though they are raising their son together; and she still considers herself a feminist. Rebecca wrote in the Daily Mail, “Having a child has been the most rewarding experience of my life. Far from ‘enslaving’ me, three-and-a-half-year-old Tenzin has opened my world. I simply love hearing his little voice calling: ‘Mummy, Mummy.’”

In her own way, Rebecca—like many other daughters of the feminist revolution—is trying to put her own set of injustices right, not through selfishness and neglect, but by loving her child.

Such women, even when they are not coming at family life from a Christian perspective, are living out the larger truth: We find our own fulfillment not by putting ourselves first, but by living for others. And that means accepting our responsibilities, and moving toward—not away from—God’s design for families.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Chuck Colson was the Chief Counsel for Richard Nixon and served time in prison for Watergate-related charges. In 1976, Colson founded Prison Fellowship Ministries, which, in collaboration with churches of all confessions and denominations, has become the world's largest outreach to prisoners, ex-prisoners, crime victims, and their families.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read Chuck Colson's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
Subject: What a bleak view you have
And I would know. I used to have a similar bleak outlook. I was 42 and had never been in love. This was not due to any "radical feminism" (and I support feminism as the radical notion that a woman is equal to a man), but to the fact that I had never met "the one". I have just recently fallen in love with my Russian boyfriend at the ripe old age of 42. Alexander is going to be 40 in 2 weeks, and he is certainly no playboy, despite being never married. He is the sweetest, nicest man I have ever known. He loves me, despite my being older, and he never has chased after 20 somethings. I'm no longer in the bleak view mode. I am walking on air....(maybe because I don't have the tatoo and my bottom is anything but sagging. More like JLo). As for biological clocks, we will cross that hurdle when we get there. I leave it in fate's hands.

Mountain Rose: "But there is one thing that can't wait: a woman's biological clock.
A young woman who has been brainwashed to wait until after 35 to have her family, starts looking around, and discovers all the good men were taken 10 years ago by the smart girls who snapped them up.
So they start wasting time dating around, only to find out that the men who are approaching 40 and aren't married yet are playboys...A few years go by, and one day she discovers that the men her age are dashing past her to hit on the 20-somethings.


COARSE FEMINISTS
Has anyone else noticed a rapidly advancing trend over the last, say fifteen years for women to describe their bodily functions to husbands and boyfriends in the most graphic detail?

What I mean is a woman [metaphorically] rubbing a man's nose in her defecation and menstruation to the extent that he immediately thinks: "that is WAY too much information!"

Formerly, decent women kept such things to themselves. I guess it's all part of feminists "reclaiming our bodies," right?

As a man, I'd have to say one is aware in the abstract that women have unpleasant bodily functions, but when one wants to see a woman as a beautiful sex object, the last thing one wants is to be reminded that she also doubles as a sh*t factory.

Nor is it especially pleasant to be confronted with pails of bloody panties front-and-center in the bathroom; or to be regaled with hard core accounts of the size of menstrual clots.

I'm in my forties and when I first started dating, women simply didn't behave this way.

Am I alone in feeling that this is not an advance?
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone: